Why do students in the same course, taught the same way, produce inconsistent outcomes?
My scholarly work is grounded in one sustained question: what does it take for learners at any stage of life to develop the higher-order thinking skills that education, career, and civic participation demand?
Formal, applied, and long-form
The work here runs in three registers. Formal research: a doctoral dissertation and a master's thesis, peer-reviewed and citable. Applied research: mentor-verified classroom inquiry cycles that set the evidence standard before the intervention began. Long-form writing: position papers and a continuing essay series that argue a case at length. The question underneath all three is the same: did the design do what it claimed?
Published and forthcoming work
The dissertation, the thesis, and The Den essay series in academic editions.
Publications →The dissertation in progress
Why the same course, taught the same way, produces inconsistent outcomes.
Current research →The longer arguments
The research agenda on AI and the full Statement on AI in Education and Work.
Long-form →Tell me what you are building.
Courses, assessments, a product that has to teach something. Send what you have and I will tell you what it needs.
Start a project →
Fox Curriculum